C. M. v. Department of Children & Families

208 So. 3d 1291, 2017 WL 629417, 2017 Fla. App. LEXIS 2132
District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided February 16, 2017·No. CASE NO. 1D16-4711·Published

Opinions

ON MOTION TO STRIKE ANSWER BRIEF

PER CURIAM.

Appellant’s Motion to Strike Answer Brief of Guardian Ad Litem as Untimely Filed is granted.

RAY and WINSOR, JJ., concur; MAKAR, J., concurring with opinion.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

C. M. v. Department of Children & Families, 208 So. 3d 1291, 2017 WL 629417, 2017 Fla. App. LEXIS 2132 (Fla. Ct. App. 2017).

208 So. 3d 1291 (C. M. v. Department of Children & Families) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

JEWISH FEDERATION v. Rapaport
682 So. 2d 1149 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1996)
Hightower v. Berry
490 So. 2d 1029 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1986)
Lindsey v. King
894 So. 2d 1058 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2005)
Gillespie v. City of Destin
946 So. 2d 1195 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2006)
Smith v. Sylvester
82 So. 3d 1159 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2012)
Ronald Matheny v. Indian River Fire Rescue/ Johns Eastern etc.
174 So. 3d 1129 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2015)
Medley Plaza, Inc. v. the Rama Fund, LLC
196 So. 3d 512 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2016)
Miccosukee Tribe of Indians of Florida v. Lewis
122 So. 3d 504 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2013)
Donaldson v. State
136 So. 3d 1281 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2014)
McCray v. State
151 So. 3d 449 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2014)
Johnston v. State
202 So. 3d 976 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2016)
In re Amendments to the Florida Rules of Judicial Administration
95 So. 3d 96 (Supreme Court of Florida, 2012)