C. M. Pearre & Co. v. Hawkins
3 Tex. L. R. 501
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in C. M. Pearre & Co. v. Hawkins. Read the opinion of the Court — 62 Tex. 434 →
Opinion
We are of the opinion that the court below did not err in holding that the two grounds for attachment in the affidavit were inconsistent, and that this rendered the application so uncertain as to require the writ to be quashed.
The judgment is affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
C. M. Pearre & Co. v. Hawkins, 3 Tex. L. R. 501 (Tex. 1884).
3 Tex. L. R. 501 (C. M. Pearre & Co. v. Hawkins) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.