C. M. Holliday v. Stephen S. Chandler, Judge of the United States District Court for the Western District of Oklahoma

255 F.2d 927, 1958 U.S. App. LEXIS 4275
CourtCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit
DecidedApril 7, 1958
Docket5836_1
StatusPublished

This text of 255 F.2d 927 (C. M. Holliday v. Stephen S. Chandler, Judge of the United States District Court for the Western District of Oklahoma) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
C. M. Holliday v. Stephen S. Chandler, Judge of the United States District Court for the Western District of Oklahoma, 255 F.2d 927, 1958 U.S. App. LEXIS 4275 (10th Cir. 1958).

Opinion

255 F.2d 927

C. M. HOLLIDAY et al.
v.
Stephen S. CHANDLER, Judge of the United States District Court for the Western District of Oklahoma.

No. 5836.

United States Court of Appeals Tenth Circuit.

April 7, 1958.

On petition for writ of prohibition.

Paul W. Updegraff, Norman, Okl., for petitioners.

Roy C. Lytle and Sid White, Oklahoma City, Okl., for respondent.

David Ferber, Washington, D. C., for Securities and Exchange Commission.

Before BRATTON, Chief Judge, and PICKETT and BREITENSTEIN, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM.

Petition for writ of prohibition denied.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
255 F.2d 927, 1958 U.S. App. LEXIS 4275, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/c-m-holliday-v-stephen-s-chandler-judge-of-the-united-states-district-ca10-1958.