C. Leon Teal v. Catherine A. Gorrie

339 F.2d 213
Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit·Decided March 8, 1965·No. 21534·Published

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

This dispute over insurance proceeds is between the insured’s husband and the designated beneficiaries, the insured’s mother and sisters with whom she was residing at the time of her death. Contrary to the contentions of the husband, the district court held that the decedent was mentally competent at the time she executed the designation of beneficiaries and that the designation was the legal act of the insured. The findings of fact were not clearly erroneous. The conclusions of law were correct. Bulger v. Ross, 1893, 98 Ala. 267, 12 So. 803; Wilson v. Payton, 1948, 251 Ala. 411, 37 So.2d 499.

The judgment is affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

C. Leon Teal v. Catherine A. Gorrie, 339 F.2d 213 (5th Cir. 1965).

339 F.2d 213 (C. Leon Teal v. Catherine A. Gorrie) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Wilson v. Payton
37 So. 2d 499 (Supreme Court of Alabama, 1948)
Bulger v. Ross
98 Ala. 267 (Supreme Court of Alabama, 1893)