C & L Transport of Citrus Co. v. Osteen

763 So. 2d 1217, 2000 Fla. App. LEXIS 6405, 2000 WL 679756
CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida
DecidedMay 26, 2000
DocketNo. 1D00-0323
StatusPublished
Cited by1 cases

This text of 763 So. 2d 1217 (C & L Transport of Citrus Co. v. Osteen) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
C & L Transport of Citrus Co. v. Osteen, 763 So. 2d 1217, 2000 Fla. App. LEXIS 6405, 2000 WL 679756 (Fla. Ct. App. 2000).

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

Having considered appellant’s response to the show cause order dated February 3, 2000, we dismiss this appeal for lack of jurisdiction. Because the Final Summary Judgment of which appellant seeks review merely grants a motion and does not actually determine liability, the order is not appealable pursuant to Florida Rule of Appellate Procedure 9.130(a) (3)(C) (iv). See Knight v. Nelson, 574 So.2d 1124, 1125 (Fla. 4th DCA 1991). And the Order on Plaintiffs Motion for Attorney’s Fees and Costs is also not an appealable order. See Winkelman v. Toll, 632 So.2d 130 (Fla. 4th DCA 1994).

DISMISSED.

JOANOS, ALLEN and KAHN, JJ., CONCUR.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Mathews v. Urezzio
788 So. 2d 1133 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2001)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
763 So. 2d 1217, 2000 Fla. App. LEXIS 6405, 2000 WL 679756, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/c-l-transport-of-citrus-co-v-osteen-fladistctapp-2000.