C., L. & N. Railway Co. v. Bokenkotter

Ohio Circuit Courts

C., L. & N. Railway Co. v. Bokenkotter

10 Ohio C.C. (n.s.) 448, 1907 Ohio Misc. LEXIS 306

DecidedJune 29, 1907

StatusPublished

This text of 10 Ohio C.C. (n.s.) 448 (C., L. & N. Railway Co. v. Bokenkotter) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Ohio Circuit Courts primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

C., L. & N. Railway Co. v. Bokenkotter, 10 Ohio C.C. (n.s.) 448, 1907 Ohio Misc. LEXIS 306 (Ohio Super. Ct. 1907).

Pincite

Opinion

There is error in the record of the trial below in that the court overruled" the motions of the plaintiffs in error at the close of the testimony offered by the defendant in error to direct the jury to return a verdict in their behalf.

The testimony clearly shows the deceased to have been guilty of contributory negligence. He was employed as station agent at Hopkins avenue station. He crossed the south-bound track to tho north-bound track, and in attempting to return did not look to see or pay any attention as to whether a train was approaching ; and yet the track was straight for two thousand feet in the direction from which the train approached, and it could have been easily discerned. .

Judgment reversed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

There is error in the record of the trial below in that the court overruled" the motions of the plaintiffs in error at the close of the testimony offered by the defendant in error to direct the jury to return a verdict in their behalf.

The testimony clearly shows the deceased to have been guilty of contributory negligence. He was employed as station agent at Hopkins avenue station. He crossed the south-bound track to tho north-bound track, and in attempting to return did not look to see or pay any attention as to whether a train was approaching ; and yet the track was straight for two thousand feet in the direction from which the train approached, and it could have been easily discerned. .

Judgment reversed.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

10 Ohio C.C. (n.s.) 448, 1907 Ohio Misc. LEXIS 306, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/c-l-n-railway-co-v-bokenkotter-ohiocirct-1907.