C. L. King & Co. v. Inlander

133 F. 416, 1902 U.S. App. LEXIS 5369
U.S. Circuit Court for the Northern District of Illnois·Decided January 11, 1902·No. No. 25,997·Published·Cited by 10 cases

Opinion

KOHLSAAT, District Judge.

The bill herein asks relief against defendant (1) for infringement of complainant’s patent, and (2) for unfair competition in trade in the use by defendant of the article alleged to be protected by said patent. No diverse citizenship is shown. The bill sets up two distinct causes of action, though relating to the same subject-matter. The ground of federal jurisdiction is distinct as to each cause of action. While it might be that a federal court could properly, in its discretion, permit the joinder of said causes of action, had it jurisdiction of each, yet it could not obtain jursdiction of a distinct cause of action by this method. Complainant’s citations touching ancillary jurisdiction are not applicable.

The demurrer to the bill is sustained on the ground of multifariousness, and, as the motion for a preliminary injunction is based solely upon the unfair competition phase of the bill, said motion is denied.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

C. L. King & Co. v. Inlander, 133 F. 416, 1902 U.S. App. LEXIS 5369 (circtndil 1902).

133 F. 416 (C. L. King & Co. v. Inlander) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Hanna v. Brictson Mfg. Co.
62 F.2d 139 (Eighth Circuit, 1932)
Stanley Mfg. Co. v. Art Metalable Corp.
47 F.2d 792 (M.D. Pennsylvania, 1931)
Vogue Co. v. Vogue Hat Co.
12 F.2d 991 (Sixth Circuit, 1926)
Unit Const. Co. v. Huskey Mfg. Co.
241 F. 129 (E.D. Pennsylvania, 1917)
Shrauger v. Phillip Bernard Co.
240 F. 131 (N.D. Iowa, 1917)
Schiebel Toy & Novelty Co. v. Clark
217 F. 760 (Sixth Circuit, 1914)
Ludwigs v. Payson Mfg. Co.
206 F. 60 (Seventh Circuit, 1913)
Johnston v. Brass Goods Mfg. Co.
201 F. 368 (E.D. New York, 1912)
Bernstein v. Danwitz
190 F. 604 (U.S. Circuit Court for the District of Southern New York, 1911)
Cushman v. Atlantis Fountain Pen Co.
164 F. 94 (U.S. Circuit Court for the District of Massachusetts, 1908)