C. L. B. v. State

Texas Supreme Court

C. L. B. v. State

567 S.W.2d 795

CourtTexas Supreme Court

DecidedJune 14, 1978

DocketNo. B-7417

StatusPublished

Cited by23 cases

This text of 567 S.W.2d 795 (C. L. B. v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Texas Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

C. L. B. v. State, 567 S.W.2d 795 (Tex. 1978).

Pincite

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

State filed its petitions alleging that. C_ L_ B_ and L_ J_ B_ engaged in delinquent conduct by committing a theft. The juveniles filed motions for summary judgment supported by their affidavits. State did not respond to the motions. The trial court granted the motions and dismissed the State’s petitions with prejudice. The court of civil appeals held that the State had a right to appeal, but reversed and remanded the summary judgments on two grounds which we do not reach. 561 S.W.2d 547.

The court of civil appeals concluded that the State was granted a right of appeal in juvenile delinquency proceedings by Tex. Rev.Civ.Stat.Ann. art. 2249, which provides that “An appeal or Writ of Error may be taken to the Court of Civil Appeals from every final judgment of the district court in civil cases.” The court reasoned that this general right of appeal was applicable to delinquency proceedings in that .such proceedings are civil in nature.

The right of appeal in juvenile proceedings is specifically controlled by Section 56.-01 of the Texas Family Code. Section (c) thereof provides that “An appeal may be taken by or on behalf of the child” from certain enumerated orders. On the other hand, the Code does not grant the State a right of appeal. This omission is particularly significant when compared with the predecessor statute, Art. 2238-1, Sec. 21, which granted the right of appeal to “any party aggrieved”. We conclude that by this omission the legislature did not grant the State the right to appeal from adverse judgments in juvenile delinquency proceedings. See also, McKnight, Texas Family Law Symposium, 5 Tex.Tech.L.Rev. 582 (1974).

The holding of the court of civil appeals is contrary to Art. 56.01 of the Texas Family Code. Accordingly, the application for writ of error is granted, and without hearing oral argument, the judgment of the court of civil appeals is reversed and that of the trial court affirmed. Rule 483, Tex.R. Civ.Proc.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

State filed its petitions alleging that. C_ L_ B_ and L_ J_ B_ engaged in delinquent conduct by committing a theft. The juveniles filed motions for summary judgment supported by their affidavits. State did not respond to the motions. The trial court granted the motions and dismissed the State’s petitions with prejudice. The court of civil appeals held that the State had a right to appeal, but reversed and remanded the summary judgments on two grounds which we do not reach. 561 S.W.2d 547.

The court of civil appeals concluded that the State was granted a right of appeal in juvenile delinquency proceedings by Tex. Rev.Civ.Stat.Ann. art. 2249, which provides that “An appeal or Writ of Error may be taken to the Court of Civil Appeals from every final judgment of the district court in civil cases.” The court reasoned that this general right of appeal was applicable to delinquency proceedings in that .such proceedings are civil in nature.

The right of appeal in juvenile proceedings is specifically controlled by Section 56.-01 of the Texas Family Code. Section (c) thereof provides that “An appeal may be taken by or on behalf of the child” from certain enumerated orders. On the other hand, the Code does not grant the State a right of appeal. This omission is particularly significant when compared with the predecessor statute, Art. 2238-1, Sec. 21, which granted the right of appeal to “any party aggrieved”. We conclude that by this omission the legislature did not grant the State the right to appeal from adverse judgments in juvenile delinquency proceedings. See also, McKnight, Texas Family Law Symposium, 5 Tex.Tech.L.Rev. 582 (1974).

The holding of the court of civil appeals is contrary to Art. 56.01 of the Texas Family Code. Accordingly, the application for writ of error is granted, and without hearing oral argument, the judgment of the court of civil appeals is reversed and that of the trial court affirmed. Rule 483, Tex.R. Civ.Proc.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

567 S.W.2d 795, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/c-l-b-v-state-tex-1978.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack