C. L. B. v. B. J. S.

Missouri Court of Appeals

C. L. B. v. B. J. S.

571 S.W.3d 244

CourtMissouri Court of Appeals

DecidedApril 9, 2019

DocketNo. ED 106813

StatusPublished

This text of 571 S.W.3d 244 (C. L. B. v. B. J. S.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Missouri Court of Appeals primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

C. L. B. v. B. J. S., 571 S.W.3d 244 (Mo. Ct. App. 2019).

Pincite

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

B.J.S. appeals from the judgment of a full order of protection entered against him on the petition of C.L.B. The trial court's judgment is supported by substantial evidence, is against the weight of the evidence and does not erroneously declares or apply the law.

*245An opinion would have no precedential value nor serve any jurisprudential purpose. The parties have been furnished with a memorandum for their information only, setting forth the reasons for this order pursuant to Rule 84.16(b).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

B.J.S. appeals from the judgment of a full order of protection entered against him on the petition of C.L.B. The trial court's judgment is supported by substantial evidence, is against the weight of the evidence and does not erroneously declares or apply the law.

*245An opinion would have no precedential value nor serve any jurisprudential purpose. The parties have been furnished with a memorandum for their information only, setting forth the reasons for this order pursuant to Rule 84.16(b).

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

571 S.W.3d 244, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/c-l-b-v-b-j-s-moctapp-2019.