C. J. Tower & Sons of Buffalo, Inc. v. United States
60 Cust. Ct. 1034, 1968 Cust. Ct. LEXIS 1880
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in C. J. Tower & Sons of Buffalo, Inc. v. United States. Read the opinion of the Court — 304 F. Supp. 1187 →
United States Customs Court·Decided April 16, 1968·No. No. P68/204; protests 64/20872 and 64/20874 (Buffalo); No. P68/205; protest 64/20873 (Buffalo)·Published
Opinion
In accordance witb stipulation of counsel that the merchandise covered by the foregoing protests consist of machines, or parts thereof, dedicated for use therewith, which perform independent steps in the manufacture of paper pulp, similar in all material respects to those the subject of Bird Machine Company v. United States (51 CCPA 42, C.A.D. 835) and A. N. Deringer, Inc. v. United States (56 Cust. Ct. 477, C.D. 2681), the claim of the plaintiff was sustained.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
C. J. Tower & Sons of Buffalo, Inc. v. United States, 60 Cust. Ct. 1034, 1968 Cust. Ct. LEXIS 1880 (cusc 1968).
60 Cust. Ct. 1034 (C. J. Tower & Sons of Buffalo, Inc. v. United States) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
A. N. Deringer, Inc. v. United States
56 Cust. Ct. 477 (U.S. Customs Court, 1966)