C. J. Hendry Co. v. Moore

Supreme Court

C. J. Hendry Co. v. Moore

316 U.S. 643, 62 S. Ct. 1036

Procedural entryThis page is a short order in C. J. Hendry Co. v. Moore. Read the opinion of the Court — 318 U.S. 133 →

Supreme Court of the United States·Decided April 13, 1942·No. No. 1083·Published

Opinion

Appeal from the Supreme Court of California.

The appeal is dismissed for want of jurisdiction. Section 237 (a), Judicial Code, as amended, 28 U. S. C. § 344 (a). Treating the papers whereon the appeal was allowed as a petition for writ of certiorari as required by § 237 (c) of the Judicial Code as amended, 28 U. S. C. § 344 (c), certiorari is [644]*644granted.

Mr. Arch E. Ekdale for appellants. Messrs. Earl Warren, Attorney General of California, and Everett W. Mattoon, Assistant Attorney General, for appellees.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Appeal from the Supreme Court of California.

The appeal is dismissed for want of jurisdiction. Section 237 (a), Judicial Code, as amended, 28 U. S. C. § 344 (a). Treating the papers whereon the appeal was allowed as a petition for writ of certiorari as required by § 237 (c) of the Judicial Code as amended, 28 U. S. C. § 344 (c), certiorari is [644]*644granted.

Mr. Arch E. Ekdale for appellants. Messrs. Earl Warren, Attorney General of California, and Everett W. Mattoon, Assistant Attorney General, for appellees.

C. J. Hendry Co. v. Moore, 316 U.S. 643, 62 S. Ct. 1036 (1942).

Pincite

316 U.S. 643 (C. J. Hendry Co. v. Moore) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related