C. I. T. Corp. v. McKinney

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

C. I. T. Corp. v. McKinney

254 A.D. 629, 3 N.Y.S.2d 92, 1938 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 6775

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedMarch 9, 1938

StatusPublished

This text of 254 A.D. 629 (C. I. T. Corp. v. McKinney) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

C. I. T. Corp. v. McKinney, 254 A.D. 629, 3 N.Y.S.2d 92, 1938 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 6775 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1938).

Pincite

Opinion

Order affirmed, with ten dollars costs and disbursements. Memorandum: Defendants having alleged as a defense and counterclaim that plaintiff took the notes with knowledge that the giving of them was induced by fraudulent representations, the case presents an issue to be tried. (See Neg. Inst. Law, § 91, subd. 4; Id. §§ 94, 95, 97, 98. See, also, Progressive Finance & Realty Co. v. Miller & Sherry Enterprises, Inc., 246 App. Div. 639, and cases there cited.) All concur. (The order denies plaintiff’s motion for summary judgment in an action on promissory notes.) Present— Sears, P. J., Crosby, Cunningham, Taylor and Dowling, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Order affirmed, with ten dollars costs and disbursements. Memorandum: Defendants having alleged as a defense and counterclaim that plaintiff took the notes with knowledge that the giving of them was induced by fraudulent representations, the case presents an issue to be tried. (See Neg. Inst. Law, § 91, subd. 4; Id. §§ 94, 95, 97, 98. See, also, Progressive Finance & Realty Co. v. Miller & Sherry Enterprises, Inc., 246 App. Div. 639, and cases there cited.) All concur. (The order denies plaintiff’s motion for summary judgment in an action on promissory notes.) Present— Sears, P. J., Crosby, Cunningham, Taylor and Dowling, JJ.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

254 A.D. 629, 3 N.Y.S.2d 92, 1938 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 6775, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/c-i-t-corp-v-mckinney-nyappdiv-1938.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack