C. Howard Hook and W. W. Miller, Doing Business as a Partnership Under the Name and Style of Hook & Miller v. Hook & Ackerman, Inc.
This text of 201 F.2d 512 (C. Howard Hook and W. W. Miller, Doing Business as a Partnership Under the Name and Style of Hook & Miller v. Hook & Ackerman, Inc.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
201 F.2d 512
C. Howard HOOK and W. W. Miller, Doing Business as a Partnership Under the Name and Style of Hook & Miller
v.
HOOK & ACKERMAN, Inc., Appellant.
No. 10828.
United States Court of Appeals Third Circuit.
Argued January 22, 1953.
Decided February 6, 1953.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of Pennsylvania; William Alva Stewart, Judge.
Harry Price, New York City (Stonecipher & Cunningham, by Charles L. Cunningham, Pittsburgh, Pa., Matthew Sidney Biron, Philadelphia, Pa., on the brief), for Harold S. Ackerman and Hook & Ackerman, Inc.
William B. Jaspert, Pittsburgh, Pa., for C. Howard Hook and W. W. Miller, ind. and d/b/a/ Hook & Miller; and R. O. Graffius.
Before GOODRICH, STALEY and HASTIE, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM.
Points presented in this appeal were all discussed in the opinion of Judge Stewart in the district court. Hook v. Hook & Ackerman, Inc., D.C.W.D.Pa.1952, 103 F. Supp. 790. We think that he was right and affirm for the reasons set out in his opinion.
The judgment of the district court will be affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
201 F.2d 512, 96 U.S.P.Q. (BNA) 429, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/c-howard-hook-and-w-w-miller-doing-business-as-a-p-ca3-1953.