C. H. v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida

C. H. v. State

170 So. 3d 912

CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida

DecidedJuly 22, 2015

DocketNo. 3D14-1932

StatusPublished

This text of 170 So. 3d 912 (C. H. v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

C. H. v. State, 170 So. 3d 912 (Fla. Ct. App. 2015).

Pincite

Opinion

LOGUE, J.

The trial court correctly entered the order for involuntary inpatient placement in an effort to provide the Appellant with the care he needed. See Burley v. State, 59 So.3d 131, 135 (Fla. 3d DCA 2011) (holding “that there was substantial competent evidence to support the trial court’s findings and involuntary commitment pursuant to the Baker Act,” but “revers[ing] the order under review and remand[ing] to allow the parties’ attorneys to make closing arguments.”). The trial court’s judgment of commitment is accordingly affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

LOGUE, J.

The trial court correctly entered the order for involuntary inpatient placement in an effort to provide the Appellant with the care he needed. See Burley v. State, 59 So.3d 131, 135 (Fla. 3d DCA 2011) (holding “that there was substantial competent evidence to support the trial court’s findings and involuntary commitment pursuant to the Baker Act,” but “revers[ing] the order under review and remand[ing] to allow the parties’ attorneys to make closing arguments.”). The trial court’s judgment of commitment is accordingly affirmed.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

170 So. 3d 912, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/c-h-v-state-fladistctapp-2015.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack