C., H. & D. Ry. Co. v. Shroder

Ohio Circuit Courts

C., H. & D. Ry. Co. v. Shroder

16 Ohio C.C. 636

DecidedJanuary 15, 1898

StatusPublished

This text of 16 Ohio C.C. 636 (C., H. & D. Ry. Co. v. Shroder) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Ohio Circuit Courts primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

C., H. & D. Ry. Co. v. Shroder, 16 Ohio C.C. 636 (Ohio Super. Ct. 1898).

Pincite

Opinion

Swing, J.

We think the judgment in-this-case should be affirmed,op [637]*637the ground that there was evidence sufficient before tbe jury to authorize it in finding that the railway company could have avoided the accident if proper care had been used, even after the street railway car had been placed in its perilous position. And we think the jury had a right to find that the street railway company was not negligent in going on the track of the O., H. & D. R’y. Co.

Thos. L. Michie, and Wm. Schmidt, Jr. for, Schroder. Poraker, Outcalt, Granger & Prior, for the Street Railway Company. Ramsey, Maxwell & Ramsey, for C., H. & D. R’y. Co.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Swing, J.

We think the judgment in-this-case should be affirmed,op [637]*637the ground that there was evidence sufficient before tbe jury to authorize it in finding that the railway company could have avoided the accident if proper care had been used, even after the street railway car had been placed in its perilous position. And we think the jury had a right to find that the street railway company was not negligent in going on the track of the O., H. & D. R’y. Co.

Thos. L. Michie, and Wm. Schmidt, Jr. for, Schroder. Poraker, Outcalt, Granger & Prior, for the Street Railway Company. Ramsey, Maxwell & Ramsey, for C., H. & D. R’y. Co.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

16 Ohio C.C. 636, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/c-h-d-ry-co-v-shroder-ohiocirct-1898.