C. H. Crow v. Dozier Constr. Co.

68 S.W.2d 285
CourtCourt of Appeals of Texas
DecidedFebruary 7, 1934
DocketNo. 7957.
StatusPublished

This text of 68 S.W.2d 285 (C. H. Crow v. Dozier Constr. Co.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Texas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
C. H. Crow v. Dozier Constr. Co., 68 S.W.2d 285 (Tex. Ct. App. 1934).

Opinion

BAUGH, Justice.

This appeal is by W. E. Riley, one of the defendants in the trial court, from an interlocutory order of the trial court overruling his plea of privilege to be sued in Lamb county, the county of his residence. Suit was on a paving assessment against appellant’s property in the town of Littlefield, Lamb county, Tex., and for foreclosure of a mechanic’s lien executed thereon by appellant, payable in Travis county, Tex. The same issues are presented in this appeal that were presented in Smith v. Dozier Construction Company, 66 S. W.(2d) 744, decided by this court on November 23, 1933; and in Stehlick v. Dozier Construction Company, 68 S.W.(2d) 284, this day decided; and were decided adversely to appellant’s contention herein. A further discussion of them here would be but a repetition, and for the reasons stated in the above cited cases, the judgment of the trial court is affirmed.

Affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Smith v. Dozier Const. Co.
66 S.W.2d 744 (Court of Appeals of Texas, 1933)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
68 S.W.2d 285, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/c-h-crow-v-dozier-constr-co-texapp-1934.