C. Flanagan Sons v. T. Galey

Court of Appeals of Texas

C. Flanagan Sons v. T. Galey

13 S.W.2d 1118, 1929 Tex. App. LEXIS 1626

Court of Appeals of Texas·Decided January 18, 1929·No. No. 1760.·Published

Opinion

HIGHTOWER, C. J.

This appeal is on all fours with cause No. 1750-C, Flanagan & Sons v. F. Carken, 11 S.W.(2d) 392, which was decided by our court and was filed therein on the 22d day of November, 1928, and for the reasons stated in the opinion of said cause No. 1750, the judgment of the lower court is reversed and rendered, in so far as it allows a recovery in favor of appellee for any amount. But in so far as the trial court’s judgment denies a recovery to appellee for lost time, as claimed by him, the judgment is affirmed.

It follows, therefore, that the judgment is reversed and rendered in part, and in part affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

HIGHTOWER, C. J.

This appeal is on all fours with cause No. 1750-C, Flanagan & Sons v. F. Carken, 11 S.W.(2d) 392, which was decided by our court and was filed therein on the 22d day of November, 1928, and for the reasons stated in the opinion of said cause No. 1750, the judgment of the lower court is reversed and rendered, in so far as it allows a recovery in favor of appellee for any amount. But in so far as the trial court’s judgment denies a recovery to appellee for lost time, as claimed by him, the judgment is affirmed.

It follows, therefore, that the judgment is reversed and rendered in part, and in part affirmed.

C. Flanagan Sons v. T. Galey, 13 S.W.2d 1118, 1929 Tex. App. LEXIS 1626 (Tex. Ct. App. 1929).

Pincite

13 S.W.2d 1118 (C. Flanagan Sons v. T. Galey) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related