C. Flanagan Sons v. T. Galey

13 S.W.2d 1118, 1929 Tex. App. LEXIS 1626
CourtCourt of Appeals of Texas
DecidedJanuary 18, 1929
DocketNo. 1760.
StatusPublished

This text of 13 S.W.2d 1118 (C. Flanagan Sons v. T. Galey) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Texas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
C. Flanagan Sons v. T. Galey, 13 S.W.2d 1118, 1929 Tex. App. LEXIS 1626 (Tex. Ct. App. 1929).

Opinion

HIGHTOWER, C. J.

This appeal is on all fours with cause No. 1750-C, Flanagan & Sons v. F. Carken, 11 S.W.(2d) 392, which was decided by our court and was filed therein on the 22d day of November, 1928, and for the reasons stated in the opinion of said cause No. 1750, the judgment of the lower court is reversed and rendered, in so far as it allows a recovery in favor of appellee for any amount. But in so far as the trial court’s judgment denies a recovery to appellee for lost time, as claimed by him, the judgment is affirmed.

It follows, therefore, that the judgment is reversed and rendered in part, and in part affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

C. Flanagan & Sons, Inc. v. Carken
11 S.W.2d 392 (Court of Appeals of Texas, 1928)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
13 S.W.2d 1118, 1929 Tex. App. LEXIS 1626, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/c-flanagan-sons-v-t-galey-texapp-1929.