C. Drago Construction Co. v. C. Carraturo Contracting Co.

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

C. Drago Construction Co. v. C. Carraturo Contracting Co.

229 A.D. 802

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedMay 15, 1930

StatusPublished

This text of 229 A.D. 802 (C. Drago Construction Co. v. C. Carraturo Contracting Co.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

C. Drago Construction Co. v. C. Carraturo Contracting Co., 229 A.D. 802 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1930).

Pincite

Opinion

Order denying motion of defendant C. Carraturo Contracting Co., Inc., to vacate plaintiff’s notice of examination before trial reversed upon the law and the facts, with ten dollars costs and disbursements to appellant, and motion granted, with ten dollars costs, to the extent of eliminating from the notice items 1 (d) and (e). Examination to proceed on five days’ notice at the place and hour stated in the order. The items stricken from the notice relate to the counterclaims in the answer, with reference to which the plaintiff may not examine in advance of the trial. Lazansky, P. J., Rich, Young, Hagarty and Carswell, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Order denying motion of defendant C. Carraturo Contracting Co., Inc., to vacate plaintiff’s notice of examination before trial reversed upon the law and the facts, with ten dollars costs and disbursements to appellant, and motion granted, with ten dollars costs, to the extent of eliminating from the notice items 1 (d) and (e). Examination to proceed on five days’ notice at the place and hour stated in the order. The items stricken from the notice relate to the counterclaims in the answer, with reference to which the plaintiff may not examine in advance of the trial. Lazansky, P. J., Rich, Young, Hagarty and Carswell, JJ., concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

229 A.D. 802, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/c-drago-construction-co-v-c-carraturo-contracting-co-nyappdiv-1930.