C. C. v. Dep't of Children & Families

253 So. 3d 774
District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided September 25, 2018·No. No. 1D18-2935·Published

Opinion

Per Curiam.

The petition for writ of mandamus is denied on the merits. See Clark v. Nichols M. N. P. , 225 So. 3d 416 (Fla. 1st DCA 2017) (holding that to be entitled to mandamus relief compelling a ruling on a pending matter, a petitioner must demonstrate that he has noticed the matter for hearing in the lower tribunal).

Wolf, Kelsey, and Jay, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

C. C. v. Dep't of Children & Families, 253 So. 3d 774 (Fla. Ct. App. 2018).

253 So. 3d 774 (C. C. v. Dep't of Children & Families) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Clark v. Nichols M. N. P.
225 So. 3d 416 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2017)