C. C. v. Department of Children and Families, The Guardian ad Litem, and Jewish Family Services

District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided September 25, 2018·No. 18-2935·Published

Opinion

FIRST DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL STATE OF FLORIDA _____________________________

No. 1D18-2935 _____________________________

C. C.,

Petitioner,

v.

DEPARTMENT OF CHILDREN AND FAMILIES, THE GUARDIAN AD LITEM, and JEWISH FAMILY SERVICES,

Respondents. _____________________________

Petition for Writ of Mandamus—Original Jurisdiction.

September 25, 2018

PER CURIAM.

The petition for writ of mandamus is denied on the merits. See Clark v. Nichols M. N. P., 225 So. 3d 416 (Fla. 1st DCA 2017) (holding that to be entitled to mandamus relief compelling a ruling on a pending matter, a petitioner must demonstrate that he has noticed the matter for hearing in the lower tribunal).

WOLF, KELSEY, and JAY, JJ., concur. _____________________________

Not final until disposition of any timely and authorized motion under Fla. R. App. P. 9.330 or 9.331. _____________________________

C.C., pro se, Petitioner.

Ward L. Metzger, Appellate Counsel, Children’s Legal Services, Jacksonville, for Respondent Department of Children and Families.

No appearance for Guardian ad Litem or Jewish Family Services, Respondents.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

C. C. v. Department of Children and Families, The Guardian ad Litem, and Jewish Family Services, (Fla. Ct. App. 2018).

C. C. v. Department of Children and Families, The Guardian ad Litem, and Jewish Family Services (C. C. v. Department of Children and Families, The Guardian ad Litem, and Jewish Family Services) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Clark v. Nichols M. N. P.
225 So. 3d 416 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2017)