C. & C. Electric Motor Co. v. Lewis

47 Ill. App. 576, 1892 Ill. App. LEXIS 115
Appellate Court of Illinois·Decided January 25, 1893·Published

Opinion

Mr. Justice Waterman.

Appellant filed its bill in the court below, asking that appellee be directed to come to an accounting with it in respect to the matters and things set forth in said bill.

A general demurrer by appellee was overruled, and the cause referred to a master to take the testimony that might be offered therein, and to state an account between the parties and report the same, together with his findings of the law and the facts.

Whereupon appellant prayed an appeal to this court, which was allowed.

An appeal does not lie from a mere order of reference to a master to take testimony, state an account, and report the same to the court; such order is not a final decree from which an appeal lies. Gage v. Eich, 56 Ill. 297; Hunter v. Hunter, 100 Ill. 519; Williamson v. Borchsenius, 26 Ill. App. 64; Daniell’s Ch. Pr., 1462, Note 5.

At law, in an action of account, the order to account is, as in chancery, merely interlocutory, and is not appealable. Anderson v. Lundburg, 41 Ill. App. 248.

The appeal in this case will therefore be dismissed.

Appeal dismissed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

C. & C. Electric Motor Co. v. Lewis, 47 Ill. App. 576, 1892 Ill. App. LEXIS 115 (Ill. Ct. App. 1893).

47 Ill. App. 576 (C. & C. Electric Motor Co. v. Lewis) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Gage v. Eich
56 Ill. 297 (Illinois Supreme Court, 1870)
Hunter v. Hunter
100 Ill. 519 (Illinois Supreme Court, 1881)
Williamson v. Borchsenius
26 Ill. App. 64 (Appellate Court of Illinois, 1888)
Anderson v. Lundburg
41 Ill. App. 248 (Appellate Court of Illinois, 1891)