C. C. C. & St. L. Ry. Co. v. De Graff

10 Ohio Cir. Dec. 825
Logan Circuit Court·Decided July 1, 1899·Published

Opinion

P®r Curiam.

The notification of the pass of an ordinance requiring lights to be erected at railroad crossings must be made to an owner of the company in question, and not to an agent, as was the case, and this must be done twenty days before the penalty is demanded. A notice served upon a company’s agent is ineffectual. Judgment reversed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

C. C. C. & St. L. Ry. Co. v. De Graff, 10 Ohio Cir. Dec. 825 (Ohio Super. Ct. 1899).

10 Ohio Cir. Dec. 825 (C. C. C. & St. L. Ry. Co. v. De Graff) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.