C. C. C. & St. L. Ry. Co. v. De Graff

10 Ohio Cir. Dec. 825
CourtLogan Circuit Court
DecidedJuly 1, 1899
StatusPublished

This text of 10 Ohio Cir. Dec. 825 (C. C. C. & St. L. Ry. Co. v. De Graff) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Logan Circuit Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
C. C. C. & St. L. Ry. Co. v. De Graff, 10 Ohio Cir. Dec. 825 (Ohio Super. Ct. 1899).

Opinion

P®r Curiam.

The notification of the pass of an ordinance requiring lights to be erected at railroad crossings must be made to an owner of the company in question, and not to an agent, as was the case, and this must be done twenty days before the penalty is demanded. A notice served upon a company’s agent is ineffectual. Judgment reversed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
10 Ohio Cir. Dec. 825, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/c-c-c-st-l-ry-co-v-de-graff-ohcirctlogan-1899.