Home/Supreme Court of Georgia/C. A. Trussell Motor Co. v. Haygood

C. A. Trussell Motor Co. v. Haygood

95 S.E.2d 279, 212 Ga. 689, 1956 Ga. LEXIS 496
CourtSupreme Court of Georgia
DecidedNovember 13, 1956
Docket19446
StatusPublished

This text of 95 S.E.2d 279 (C. A. Trussell Motor Co. v. Haygood) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Georgia primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
C. A. Trussell Motor Co. v. Haygood, 95 S.E.2d 279, 212 Ga. 689, 1956 Ga. LEXIS 496 (Ga. 1956).

Opinion

Duckworth, Chief Justice.

Since the grant of certiorari in this case, we have heard arguments of counsel, and upon further and more careful consideration we have concluded that the allegations of the petition were sufficient to withstand the demurrer, and that the Court of Appeals did not err in so holding. Accordingly, the writ of certiorari was inadvertently granted and the same is dismissed. Carter v. Atlanta Life Ins. Co., 180 Ga. 419 (179 S. E. 80); First Nat. Bank of Atlanta v. Williams, 191 Ga. 611 (13 S. E. 2d 361).

Certiorari dismissed.

All the Justices concur, except Wyatt, P. J., not participating.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

First National Bank v. Williams
13 S.E.2d 361 (Supreme Court of Georgia, 1941)
Carter v. Atlanta Life Insurance
179 S.E. 80 (Supreme Court of Georgia, 1935)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
95 S.E.2d 279, 212 Ga. 689, 1956 Ga. LEXIS 496, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/c-a-trussell-motor-co-v-haygood-ga-1956.