C. A. Dawson Co. v. D. F. Murphy Co.

Idaho Supreme Court

C. A. Dawson Co. v. D. F. Murphy Co.

243 P. 1118, 42 Idaho 131, 1926 Ida. LEXIS 62

Idaho Supreme Court·Decided February 2, 1926·Published

Opinion

WM, E. LEE, J.

This appeal was perfected and the transcript filed December 5, 1924. The cause was regularly-reached on the calendar and set down and noticed for argument. Respondents appeared but appellant was not represented at the time fixed for the argument and has not filed a bi’ief. We have, however, examined the transcript, and finding no fundamental error in the record, under Rule 48, on motion of respondents, the judgment is affirmed.

William A. Lee, C. J., and Budge, Givens and Taylor, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

WM, E. LEE, J.

This appeal was perfected and the transcript filed December 5, 1924. The cause was regularly-reached on the calendar and set down and noticed for argument. Respondents appeared but appellant was not represented at the time fixed for the argument and has not filed a bi’ief. We have, however, examined the transcript, and finding no fundamental error in the record, under Rule 48, on motion of respondents, the judgment is affirmed.

William A. Lee, C. J., and Budge, Givens and Taylor, JJ., concur.

C. A. Dawson Co. v. D. F. Murphy Co., 243 P. 1118, 42 Idaho 131, 1926 Ida. LEXIS 62 (Idaho 1926).

Pincite

243 P. 1118 (C. A. Dawson Co. v. D. F. Murphy Co.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.