Bystrom v. Rohlen

158 N.W. 796, 134 Minn. 67, 1916 Minn. LEXIS 587
CourtSupreme Court of Minnesota
DecidedJuly 14, 1916
DocketNos. 19,828—(189)
StatusPublished
Cited by2 cases

This text of 158 N.W. 796 (Bystrom v. Rohlen) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Minnesota primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Bystrom v. Rohlen, 158 N.W. 796, 134 Minn. 67, 1916 Minn. LEXIS 587 (Mich. 1916).

Opinion

Taylor, C.

This is an appeal from an order made by the district court of Swift county apportioning between the parties hereto the reward given by [68]*68statute for the arrest and conviction of a horse thief. Appellants contend that respondent is barred from participating in,thc reward by the fact that he was a constable and the night marshal of the village of Milan. Neither the theft nor the arrest took place within that village, and the arrest was made without a warrant. While a village constable as a peace officer may, under certain circumstances, make an arrest outside his village and without a warrant for an offense committed outside the village, the law does not command him to do so, and if he aids in making such an arrest he may participate in a reward offered for the arrest and conviction of the offender. Burkee v. Matson, 114 Minn. 233, 130 N. W. 1025, 34 L.R.A. (N.S.) 924.

Order affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Dobosenski v. Carlton County
157 N.W.2d 847 (Supreme Court of Minnesota, 1968)
Maggi v. Cassiday
190 Iowa 933 (Supreme Court of Iowa, 1921)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
158 N.W. 796, 134 Minn. 67, 1916 Minn. LEXIS 587, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/bystrom-v-rohlen-minn-1916.