Byron v. United States

Fourth Circuit

Byron v. United States

43 F.2d 360, 1930 U.S. App. LEXIS 3894

CourtCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit

DecidedJuly 16, 1930

DocketNo. 2965

StatusPublished

This text of 43 F.2d 360 (Byron v. United States) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Byron v. United States, 43 F.2d 360, 1930 U.S. App. LEXIS 3894 (4th Cir. 1930).

Pincite

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

We do not think that the transaction involved in this ease amounted to a transportation of intoxicating liquor within the meaning and intent of the National Prohibition Act (27 USCA). Hill v. State, 96 Tex. Cr. R. 165, 256 S. W. 921; Warren v. State, 94 Tex. Cr. R. 243, 250 S. W. 429; Locke v. City of Ft. Smith, 155 Ark. 158, 244 S. W. 11; 33 C. J. 582; Thorpe on Prohibition ■218.' There was error, therefore, in the charge of the learned trial judge, and the defendant is entitled to a new trial.

Reversed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

We do not think that the transaction involved in this ease amounted to a transportation of intoxicating liquor within the meaning and intent of the National Prohibition Act (27 USCA). Hill v. State, 96 Tex. Cr. R. 165, 256 S. W. 921; Warren v. State, 94 Tex. Cr. R. 243, 250 S. W. 429; Locke v. City of Ft. Smith, 155 Ark. 158, 244 S. W. 11; 33 C. J. 582; Thorpe on Prohibition ■218.' There was error, therefore, in the charge of the learned trial judge, and the defendant is entitled to a new trial.

Reversed.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

43 F.2d 360, 1930 U.S. App. LEXIS 3894, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/byron-v-united-states-ca4-1930.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack