Byron v. Spektor
This text of 266 A.D.2d 253 (Byron v. Spektor) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
—In an action to recover damages for medical malpractice, the defendant Iosif Spektor appeals from an order of the Supreme Court, Kings County (Spodek, J.), dated April 22, 1999, which denied his motion to change venue from Kings County to New York County.
Ordered that the order is affirmed, with costs.
The branch of the defendant’s motion which was to change venue based on CPLR 510 (1) was untimely since no demand to change venue was served with the answer or before the answer had been served (see, CPLR 511 [a], [b]; Newman v Physicians’ Reciprocal Insurers, 204 AD2d 210). While in certain limited circumstances a court confronted with an untimely motion for a change of venue may exercise its discretion to grant the motion {see, Newman v Physicians’ Reciprocal Insurers, supra), the defendant in this case did not present an adequate basis to support a change of venue based on CPLR 510 (1) (see, Montoya v Brown, 233 AD2d 374).
The branch of the defendant’s motion which was to change venue based on CPLR 510 (3) was also properly denied, as the defendant’s submission was insufficient to support a change of venue on that ground (see, O’Brien v Vassar Bros. Hosp., 207 [254]*254AD2d 169). O’Brien, J. P., Sullivan, Goldstein and Feuerstein, JJ., concur.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
266 A.D.2d 253, 698 N.Y.S.2d 290, 1999 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 11336, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/byron-v-spektor-nyappdiv-1999.