Byron v. Gingold
111 A.D. 917, 96 N.Y.S. 1116
CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
DecidedJanuary 15, 1906
StatusPublished
This text of 111 A.D. 917 (Byron v. Gingold) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Bluebook
Byron v. Gingold, 111 A.D. 917, 96 N.Y.S. 1116 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1906).
Opinion
We think the plaintiff assumed the hazard of obtaining a loan upon terms satisfactory to defendant; he fails to show that he did this. The judgment of the Municipal Court must, therefore, be reversed and a new trial ordered, costs to abide the event. Jenks, Hooker, Gaynor, Rich and Miller, JJ., concurred.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Bluebook (online)
111 A.D. 917, 96 N.Y.S. 1116, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/byron-v-gingold-nyappdiv-1906.