Byron Keith Booker v. State

Court of Appeals of Texas·Decided September 24, 2015·No. 05-15-00621-CR·Published

Opinion

Order entered September 24, 2015

In The Court of Appeals Fifth District of Texas at Dallas No. 05-15-00621-CR

BYRON KEITH BOOKER, Appellant

V.

THE STATE OF TEXAS, Appellee

On Appeal from the 291st Judicial District Court Dallas County, Texas Trial Court Cause No. F09-58130-U

ORDER On August 10, 2015, the Court sent the trial court a letter stating the amended

certification reflecting appellant waived his right to appeal did not appear to be accurate.

Specifically, nothing in the written plea agreement form nor the reporter’s record from the

hearing on the State’s motion to proceed to adjudicate guilt showed appellant waived his right to

appeal. We asked the trial court to review the record and file an amended certification that

accurately reflects the proceedings or written documentation supporting the certification already

filed. To date, we have had no response from the trial court. Additionally, appellant’s brief is

overdue.

Accordingly, we ORDER the trial court to do the following. • The trial court shall determine whether the certification that states appellant waived the right to appeal is supported by the clerk’s and reporter’s records. If the trial court determines that the certification is accurate, the trial court’s findings shall include specific references to the portions of the record that support the certification. If the trial court determines that appellant did not waive his right to appeal, the trial court is ORDERED to prepare an amended certification that accurately reflects the trial court proceedings regarding the hearing on the motion to adjudicate guilt.

• The trial court shall next determine why appellant’s brief has not been filed. In this regard, the trial court shall make appropriate findings and recommendations and determine whether appellant desires to prosecute the appeal, whether appellant is indigent, or if not indigent, whether retained counsel has abandoned the appeal. See TEX. R. APP. P. 38.8(b). If the trial court cannot obtain appellant’s presence at the hearing, the trial court shall conduct the hearing in appellant’s absence. See Meza v. State, 742 S.W.2d 708 (Tex. App.–Corpus Christi 1987, no pet.) (per curiam). If appellant is indigent, the trial court is ORDERED to take such measures as may be necessary to assure effective representation, which may include appointment of new counsel.

We ORDER the trial court to transmit a record of the proceedings, which shall include

written findings of fact, any supporting documentation, and any orders, to this Court within

THIRTY DAYS of the date of this order. If the trial court prepares an amended certification of

appellant’s right to appeal, the supplemental record shall contain that amended certification.

We DIRECT the Clerk to send copies of this order to the Honorable Stephanie Mitchell,

Presiding Judge, 291st Judicial District Court; Felicia Pitre, Dallas County District Clerk; and to

counsel for all parties.

We ABATE the appeal to allow the trial court to comply with the above order. The

appeal shall be reinstated thirty days from the date of this order or when the findings are

received.

/s/ ADA BROWN JUSTICE

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Byron Keith Booker v. State, (Tex. Ct. App. 2015).

Byron Keith Booker v. State (Byron Keith Booker v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Meza v. State
742 S.W.2d 708 (Court of Appeals of Texas, 1987)