Byron Keith Booker v. State
Opinion
Order entered September 24, 2015
In The Court of Appeals Fifth District of Texas at Dallas No. 05-15-00621-CR
BYRON KEITH BOOKER, Appellant
V.
THE STATE OF TEXAS, Appellee
On Appeal from the 291st Judicial District Court Dallas County, Texas Trial Court Cause No. F09-58130-U
ORDER On August 10, 2015, the Court sent the trial court a letter stating the amended
certification reflecting appellant waived his right to appeal did not appear to be accurate.
Specifically, nothing in the written plea agreement form nor the reporter’s record from the
hearing on the State’s motion to proceed to adjudicate guilt showed appellant waived his right to
appeal. We asked the trial court to review the record and file an amended certification that
accurately reflects the proceedings or written documentation supporting the certification already
filed. To date, we have had no response from the trial court. Additionally, appellant’s brief is
overdue.
Accordingly, we ORDER the trial court to do the following. • The trial court shall determine whether the certification that states appellant waived the right to appeal is supported by the clerk’s and reporter’s records. If the trial court determines that the certification is accurate, the trial court’s findings shall include specific references to the portions of the record that support the certification. If the trial court determines that appellant did not waive his right to appeal, the trial court is ORDERED to prepare an amended certification that accurately reflects the trial court proceedings regarding the hearing on the motion to adjudicate guilt.
• The trial court shall next determine why appellant’s brief has not been filed. In this regard, the trial court shall make appropriate findings and recommendations and determine whether appellant desires to prosecute the appeal, whether appellant is indigent, or if not indigent, whether retained counsel has abandoned the appeal. See TEX. R. APP. P. 38.8(b). If the trial court cannot obtain appellant’s presence at the hearing, the trial court shall conduct the hearing in appellant’s absence. See Meza v. State, 742 S.W.2d 708 (Tex. App.–Corpus Christi 1987, no pet.) (per curiam). If appellant is indigent, the trial court is ORDERED to take such measures as may be necessary to assure effective representation, which may include appointment of new counsel.
We ORDER the trial court to transmit a record of the proceedings, which shall include
written findings of fact, any supporting documentation, and any orders, to this Court within
THIRTY DAYS of the date of this order. If the trial court prepares an amended certification of
appellant’s right to appeal, the supplemental record shall contain that amended certification.
We DIRECT the Clerk to send copies of this order to the Honorable Stephanie Mitchell,
Presiding Judge, 291st Judicial District Court; Felicia Pitre, Dallas County District Clerk; and to
counsel for all parties.
We ABATE the appeal to allow the trial court to comply with the above order. The
appeal shall be reinstated thirty days from the date of this order or when the findings are
received.
/s/ ADA BROWN JUSTICE
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Byron Keith Booker v. State (Byron Keith Booker v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.