Byron Justice and Aaron Johnson v. Janet Mortenson, Permanent Receiver for National Life Settlements, LLC And NATT, LLC

CourtCourt of Appeals of Texas
DecidedAugust 28, 2015
Docket03-15-00018-CV
StatusPublished

This text of Byron Justice and Aaron Johnson v. Janet Mortenson, Permanent Receiver for National Life Settlements, LLC And NATT, LLC (Byron Justice and Aaron Johnson v. Janet Mortenson, Permanent Receiver for National Life Settlements, LLC And NATT, LLC) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Texas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Byron Justice and Aaron Johnson v. Janet Mortenson, Permanent Receiver for National Life Settlements, LLC And NATT, LLC, (Tex. Ct. App. 2015).

Opinion

TEXAS COURT OF APPEALS, THIRD DISTRICT, AT AUSTIN

NO. 03-15-00018-CV

Byron Justice and Aaron Johnson, Appellants

v.

Janet Mortenson, Permanent Receiver for National Life Settlements, LLC; and NATT, LLC, Appellees

FROM THE DISTRICT COURT OF TRAVIS COUNTY, 98TH JUDICIAL DISTRICT NO. D-1-GN-11-000545, HONORABLE STEPHEN YELENOSKY, JUDGE PRESIDING

MEMORANDUM OPINION

Appellants Byron Justice and Aaron Johnson have filed pro se notices of appeal from

a district court order granting the Receiver’s motion for partial summary judgment. Review of

the clerk’s record in this case confirms that the order is not final because it does not dispose of

all claims against all parties. See Lehmann v. Har-Con Corp., 39 S.W.3d 191, 195 (Tex. 2001).

Additionally, there is no statutory basis for review of this interlocutory order. Cf. Tex. Civ. Prac.

& Rem. Code § 51.014. The Court accordingly wrote appellants on February 13, 2015, advising

of the jurisdictional defect and requesting a response explaining how we have jurisdiction by

February 23, 2015. We cautioned appellants that failure to file a response within the time requested

would result in dismissal of the appeal without further notice. As of today’s date, appellants have

not filed a response. We dismiss the appeal for want of jurisdiction. See Tex. R. App. P. 42.3(a). __________________________________________

Bob Pemberton, Justice

Before Chief Justice Rose, Justices Pemberton and Field

Dismissed for Want of Jurisdiction

Filed: August 27, 2015

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Lehmann v. Har-Con Corp.
39 S.W.3d 191 (Texas Supreme Court, 2001)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
Byron Justice and Aaron Johnson v. Janet Mortenson, Permanent Receiver for National Life Settlements, LLC And NATT, LLC, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/byron-justice-and-aaron-johnson-v-janet-mortenson--texapp-2015.