Byron Hoch, Jr. v. Superintendent Keyser Officer Loydd Sergeant Cutters

Fourth Circuit

Byron Hoch, Jr. v. Superintendent Keyser Officer Loydd Sergeant Cutters

54 F.3d 773, 1995 U.S. App. LEXIS 17374, 1995 WL 310166

CourtCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit

DecidedMay 22, 1995

Docket94-7330

StatusPublished

This text of 54 F.3d 773 (Byron Hoch, Jr. v. Superintendent Keyser Officer Loydd Sergeant Cutters) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Byron Hoch, Jr. v. Superintendent Keyser Officer Loydd Sergeant Cutters, 54 F.3d 773, 1995 U.S. App. LEXIS 17374, 1995 WL 310166 (4th Cir. 1995).

Pincite

Opinion

54 F.3d 773
NOTICE: Fourth Circuit I.O.P. 36.6 states that citation of unpublished dispositions is disfavored except for establishing res judicata, estoppel, or the law of the case and requires service of copies of cited unpublished dispositions of the Fourth Circuit.

Byron HOCH, Jr., Plaintiff-Appellant,
v.
Superintendent KEYSER; Officer Loydd; Sergeant Cutters,
Defendants-Appellees.

No. 94-7330.

United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.

Submitted Feb. 28, 1995.
Decided May 22, 1995.

Byron Hoch, Jr., appellant pro se. Mark Ralph Davis, Office of the Attorney General of Virginia, Richmond, VA, for appellees.

Before NIEMEYER and HAMILTON, Circuit Judges, and PHILLIPS, Senior Circuit Judge.

PER CURIAM:

Appellant appeals from the district court's order denying relief on his 42 U.S.C. Sec. 1983 (1988) complaint. Our review of the record and the district court's opinion discloses that this appeal is without merit. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court. Hoch v. Keyser, No. CA-94-169 (W.D.Va. Nov. 1, 1994). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the Court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

54 F.3d 773
NOTICE: Fourth Circuit I.O.P. 36.6 states that citation of unpublished dispositions is disfavored except for establishing res judicata, estoppel, or the law of the case and requires service of copies of cited unpublished dispositions of the Fourth Circuit.

Byron HOCH, Jr., Plaintiff-Appellant,
v.
Superintendent KEYSER; Officer Loydd; Sergeant Cutters,
Defendants-Appellees.

No. 94-7330.

United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.

Submitted Feb. 28, 1995.
Decided May 22, 1995.

Byron Hoch, Jr., appellant pro se. Mark Ralph Davis, Office of the Attorney General of Virginia, Richmond, VA, for appellees.

Before NIEMEYER and HAMILTON, Circuit Judges, and PHILLIPS, Senior Circuit Judge.

PER CURIAM:

Appellant appeals from the district court's order denying relief on his 42 U.S.C. Sec. 1983 (1988) complaint. Our review of the record and the district court's opinion discloses that this appeal is without merit. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court. Hoch v. Keyser, No. CA-94-169 (W.D.Va. Nov. 1, 1994). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the Court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

54 F.3d 773, 1995 U.S. App. LEXIS 17374, 1995 WL 310166, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/byron-hoch-jr-v-superintendent-keyser-officer-loyd-ca4-1995.