Byron Douglas Brigham v. State

Court of Appeals of Texas·Decided October 10, 2018·No. 06-18-00113-CR·Published

Opinion

In The Court of Appeals Sixth Appellate District of Texas at Texarkana

No. 06-18-00113-CR

BYRON DOUGLAS BRIGHAM, Appellant

V.

THE STATE OF TEXAS, Appellee

On Appeal from the 354th District Court Hunt County, Texas Trial Court No. 31265

Before Morriss, C.J., Moseley and Burgess, JJ. ORDER

Appellant Byron Douglas Brigham was convicted of possession of a controlled substance

and was sentenced to two years’ confinement. On September 27, 2018, Brigham’s court-appointed

appellate counsel, Frank R. Hughes, III, filed an Anders 1 brief, and on October 5, 2018, Brigham

filed his pro se motion for access to the record. Pursuant to Kelly v. State, 436 S.W.3d 313, 321–

22 (Tex. Crim. App. 2014), we are now required to enter an order specifying the procedure to be

followed to ensure Brigham’s access to the record. This order is intended to accomplish that goal.

Hughes advised this Court that on October 9, 2018, he mailed a complete paper copy of

the appellate record to Brigham. Allowing a generous fifteen days for that record to be delivered

to Brigham and giving Brigham thirty days to prepare and file his pro se response, we hereby set

November 26, 2018, as the deadline for Brigham to file his pro se response to Hughes’ Anders

brief.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

BY THE COURT

DATE: October 10, 2018

1 See Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Byron Douglas Brigham v. State, (Tex. Ct. App. 2018).

Byron Douglas Brigham v. State (Byron Douglas Brigham v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Anders v. California
386 U.S. 738 (Supreme Court, 1967)
Kelly, Sylvester
436 S.W.3d 313 (Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas, 2014)