Byrom v. Riley

114 S.E. 642, 154 Ga. 580, 1922 Ga. LEXIS 424
Supreme Court of Georgia·Decided November 25, 1922·No. No. 3044·Published·Cited by 6 cases

Opinion

Hill, J.

1. “A writing which upon its face professes to pass title to realty, but which does not do so, either from a want of title in the person making it, or from a defect in the conveyance, but which defines the property purported to be conveyed, is sufficient to constitute color of title. Street v. Collier, 118 Ga. 470 (45 S. E. 294).” Turner v. Neisler, 141 Ga. 27 (6) (80 S. E. 461); Beverly v. Burke, 9 Ga. 440 (2), 443 (54 Am. D. 351).

2. Adverse possession of land, under written evidence of title, foi seven years will give a title by prescription. Civil Code (1910), § 4169.

3. The evidence authorized, if it did not demand, the verdict returned in favor of the defendants,

4. The charges of the court complained of, and the rulings on the admissibility of evidence, do not require a reversal.

Judgment affirmed.

All the Justices eoneur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Byrom v. Riley, 114 S.E. 642, 154 Ga. 580, 1922 Ga. LEXIS 424 (Ga. 1922).

114 S.E. 642 (Byrom v. Riley) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Rogers v. Manning
38 S.E.2d 724 (Supreme Court of Georgia, 1946)
Slade v. Barber
37 S.E.2d 143 (Supreme Court of Georgia, 1946)
Gooch v. Citizens & Southern National Bank
26 S.E.2d 727 (Supreme Court of Georgia, 1943)
Warlick v. Rome Loan & Finance Co.
22 S.E.2d 61 (Supreme Court of Georgia, 1942)
Kerlin v. Southern Bell Telephone & Telegraph Co.
13 S.E.2d 790 (Supreme Court of Georgia, 1941)
Dorsey v. Dorsey
7 S.E.2d 273 (Supreme Court of Georgia, 1940)