Byrnes v. United States

5 Cust. Ct. 628, 1940 Cust. Ct. LEXIS 3290
CourtUnited States Customs Court
DecidedDecember 9, 1940
DocketNo. 5064; Entry Nos. 3609, 10339
StatusPublished

This text of 5 Cust. Ct. 628 (Byrnes v. United States) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering United States Customs Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Byrnes v. United States, 5 Cust. Ct. 628, 1940 Cust. Ct. LEXIS 3290 (cusc 1940).

Opinion

Olivek, Presiding Judge:

These appeals to reappraisement have been submitted for decision upon the following stipulation of counsel for the parties hereto:

It is hereby stipulated and agreed by and between counsel for plaintiff and the Assistant Attorney General, attorney for the United States, that the merchandise represented by the items marked “A” on the invoices and checked by examiner L. D. Johnson LDJ (name and initials of examiner) consists of safety matches of the strike-on-box type imported from Finland after May 11, 1934; that the appraisal of this merchandise under the anti-dumping act of 1921 was based upon the finding of dumping by the Secretary of the Treasury dated March 23, 1931, TD 47716, which finding was revoked June 13, 1940, TD 50169, as to merchandise imported after May 11, 1934, and that upon this stipulation these cases may be submitted, the appeals to be regarded as limited to said items marked “A”.
Plaintiff waives the right to first docket call.
It is further affirmed by the undersigned, George R. Tuttle, member of the firm of Lawrence & Tuttle, counsel for plaintiff, that he has personally examined these appeals, and of his own knowledge certifies that they have been duly signed and filed within the statutory time.

On the agreed facts, I find, as to the merchandise represented by the items marked A on the invoices and checked by Examiner L. D. Johnson, that the appraiser’s findings of values as the foreign-market values on dates of purchase, purchase prices, and foreign market values on dates of exportation, under the Antidumping Act of 1921, are null and void and of no effect. Judgment will be rendered accordingly.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
5 Cust. Ct. 628, 1940 Cust. Ct. LEXIS 3290, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/byrnes-v-united-states-cusc-1940.