Byrnes v. State
619 So. 2d 522, 1993 Fla. App. LEXIS 6702, 1993 WL 215591
Opinion
Appellant petitioned the circuit court for a writ of mandamus, arguing that he was improperly denied restoration of forfeited gain time. Appellant failed to demonstrate he had exhausted available administrative remedies, and we therefore affirm without prejudice to appellant’s right to file a new petition correcting these deficiencies. See Tunstall v. Folsom, 616 So.2d 1123 (Fla. 1st DCA 1993).
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Byrnes v. State, 619 So. 2d 522, 1993 Fla. App. LEXIS 6702, 1993 WL 215591 (Fla. Ct. App. 1993).
619 So. 2d 522 (Byrnes v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Tunstall v. Folsom
616 So. 2d 1123 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1993)