Byrnes v. Metropolitan Street Railway Co.

92 N.Y.S. 1118

Opinion

Action by Kate Byrnes against the Metropolitan Street Railway Company. B. H. Ames, for appellant. A. E. Woodruff, for respondent. No opinion. Order affirmed, with $10 costs and disbursements.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Byrnes v. Metropolitan Street Railway Co., 92 N.Y.S. 1118 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1905).

92 N.Y.S. 1118 (Byrnes v. Metropolitan Street Railway Co.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.