Byrnes v. Malloy

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

Byrnes v. Malloy

283 A.D.2d 427, 723 N.Y.S.2d 884, 2001 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 4742

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedMay 7, 2001

StatusPublished

Cited by3 cases

This text of 283 A.D.2d 427 (Byrnes v. Malloy) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Byrnes v. Malloy, 283 A.D.2d 427, 723 N.Y.S.2d 884, 2001 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 4742 (N.Y. Ct. App. 2001).

Pincite

Opinion

—In a child custody proceeding pursuant to Family Court Act article 6, the appeal is from an order of the Family Court, Dutchess County (Amodeo, J.), dated August 5, 1999, which granted the petition and awarded custody of the parties’ two children to the father.

[428]*428Ordered that the appeal is dismissed as academic, without costs or disbursements.

Subsequent to the entry of the order appealed from, the parties entered into a stipulation, dated April 14, 2000, which was placed on the record. The stipulation granted custody of the parties’ two children to the father and liberal visitation to the mother. Any determination by this Court will not affect the rights of the parties with respect to this proceeding. Accordingly, the appeal must be dismissed as academic (see, Matter of Hearst Corp. v Clyne, 50 NY2d 707). The matter does not warrant invoking an exception to the mootness doctrine (see, Matter of Hearst Corp. v Clyne, supra, at 714). Altman, J. P., Friedmann, Goldstein and Cozier, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

—In a child custody proceeding pursuant to Family Court Act article 6, the appeal is from an order of the Family Court, Dutchess County (Amodeo, J.), dated August 5, 1999, which granted the petition and awarded custody of the parties’ two children to the father.

[428]*428Ordered that the appeal is dismissed as academic, without costs or disbursements.

Subsequent to the entry of the order appealed from, the parties entered into a stipulation, dated April 14, 2000, which was placed on the record. The stipulation granted custody of the parties’ two children to the father and liberal visitation to the mother. Any determination by this Court will not affect the rights of the parties with respect to this proceeding. Accordingly, the appeal must be dismissed as academic (see, Matter of Hearst Corp. v Clyne, 50 NY2d 707). The matter does not warrant invoking an exception to the mootness doctrine (see, Matter of Hearst Corp. v Clyne, supra, at 714). Altman, J. P., Friedmann, Goldstein and Cozier, JJ., concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

283 A.D.2d 427, 723 N.Y.S.2d 884, 2001 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 4742, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/byrnes-v-malloy-nyappdiv-2001.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack