Byrnes v. Chase National Bank

168 N.E. 423, 251 N.Y. 551, 1929 N.Y. LEXIS 804
New York Court of Appeals·Decided June 13, 1929·Published·Cited by 5 cases

Opinion

*552 Per Curiam.

No appeal having been taken to the Appellate Division from the judgment of the trial court dismissing the complaint as to the defendants Conant and Elliman, the question of the liability of said defendants is not before this court, and they have been erroneously designated as respondents on this appeal.

The judgment of the Appellate Division dismissing the complaint as to the defendants other than Conant and Elliman, should be affirmed with costs.

Cardozo, Ch. J., Pound, Crane, Lehman, Kellogg and O’Brien, JJ., concur; Hubbs, J., not sitting.

Judgment accordingly.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Byrnes v. Chase National Bank, 168 N.E. 423, 251 N.Y. 551, 1929 N.Y. LEXIS 804 (N.Y. 1929).

168 N.E. 423 (Byrnes v. Chase National Bank) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Bank of New York Mellon v. Cronin
2017 NY Slip Op 5287 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2017)
Burgoyne v. James
156 Misc. 859 (New York Supreme Court, 1935)
Brown v. Bedell
188 N.E. 641 (New York Court of Appeals, 1934)
Wild v. Commissioner of Internal Revenue
62 F.2d 777 (Second Circuit, 1933)
Brown v. Bedell
148 Misc. 550 (New York Supreme Court, 1932)