Byrnes v. Chase National Bank

New York Court of Appeals

Byrnes v. Chase National Bank

168 N.E. 423, 251 N.Y. 551, 1929 N.Y. LEXIS 804

CourtNew York Court of Appeals

DecidedJune 13, 1929

StatusPublished

Cited by5 cases

This text of 168 N.E. 423 (Byrnes v. Chase National Bank) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering New York Court of Appeals primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Byrnes v. Chase National Bank, 168 N.E. 423, 251 N.Y. 551, 1929 N.Y. LEXIS 804 (N.Y. 1929).

Pincite

Opinion

*552 Per Curiam.

No appeal having been taken to the Appellate Division from the judgment of the trial court dismissing the complaint as to the defendants Conant and Elliman, the question of the liability of said defendants is not before this court, and they have been erroneously designated as respondents on this appeal.

The judgment of the Appellate Division dismissing the complaint as to the defendants other than Conant and Elliman, should be affirmed with costs.

Cardozo, Ch. J., Pound, Crane, Lehman, Kellogg and O’Brien, JJ., concur; Hubbs, J., not sitting.

Judgment accordingly.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI