Byrnes v. Byrnes
This text of 404 So. 2d 1126 (Byrnes v. Byrnes) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Wife appeals from a final judgment of dissolution alleging multiple error on the part of the trial court.
We find no abuse of discretion on any issue except for the court’s failure to reserve jurisdiction to award further rehabilitative alimony. In that respect, the judgment below is reversed with directions to reserve jurisdiction to make such further order as may be justified at the conclusion of the rehabilitative period. Mumm v. Mumm, 353 So.2d 134 (Fla. 3d DCA 1977); Hyatt v. Hyatt, 315 So.2d 11 (Fla. 3d DCA 1975).
Affirmed in part; reversed in part. Remanded with directions.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
404 So. 2d 1126, 1981 Fla. App. LEXIS 21415, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/byrnes-v-byrnes-fladistctapp-1981.