Byrnes v. Byrnes

404 So. 2d 1126, 1981 Fla. App. LEXIS 21415
District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided October 20, 1981·No. No. 80-2420·Published

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

Wife appeals from a final judgment of dissolution alleging multiple error on the part of the trial court.

We find no abuse of discretion on any issue except for the court’s failure to reserve jurisdiction to award further rehabilitative alimony. In that respect, the judgment below is reversed with directions to reserve jurisdiction to make such further order as may be justified at the conclusion of the rehabilitative period. Mumm v. Mumm, 353 So.2d 134 (Fla. 3d DCA 1977); Hyatt v. Hyatt, 315 So.2d 11 (Fla. 3d DCA 1975).

Affirmed in part; reversed in part. Remanded with directions.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Byrnes v. Byrnes, 404 So. 2d 1126, 1981 Fla. App. LEXIS 21415 (Fla. Ct. App. 1981).

404 So. 2d 1126 (Byrnes v. Byrnes) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Mumm v. Mumm
353 So. 2d 134 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1977)
Hyatt v. Hyatt
315 So. 2d 11 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1975)