Byrne v. Yeats Construction Management, Inc.
Opinion
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK
ROBERT BYRNE,
Plaintiff, - against - 12CV5355 (LMS)
YEATS CONSTRUCTION MANAGEMENT, INC. ORDER and MONOMOY FARM LLC,
Defendants.
THE HONORABLE LISA MARGARET SMITH, U.S.M.J. In connection with the Court's adjudication of an inquest on damages resulting from the default of Defendant Yeats Construction Management, Inc., Plaintiff has submitted to the Court copies of medical records as well as a July 15, 2013, assessment report from Plaintiff's orthopedic surgeon. See Byrne Aff. (Docket # 29) Exs. A (A-2 to A-7) & B. These documents are not properly authenticated, however, and therefore they cannot be considered by the Court in deciding an appropriate damages award. See, e.g., Jordonne v. Ole Bar & Grill, Inc., 13 Civ. 1573 (VB)(JCM), 2016 WL 3409088, at *6 (S.D.N.Y. Apr. 26, 2016) (medical records submitted in connection with an inquest on damages which were not properly authenticated were "inadmissible hearsay documents [that] cannot be considered in the Court's damages determination"), adopted by 2016 WL 3360524 (S.D.N.Y. June 16, 2016). Accordingly, if Plaintiff seeks to have the Court consider these documents, then Plaintiff must submit the proper authentication for them by no later than September 1, 2020. Dated: August 4, 2020 White Plains, New York
SO ORDERED,
_______________________________ Lisa Margaret Smith United States Magistrate Judge Southern District of New York
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Byrne v. Yeats Construction Management, Inc. (Byrne v. Yeats Construction Management, Inc.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.