Byrne v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Byrne v. State

365 So. 2d 812, 1979 Fla. App. LEXIS 14071

CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida

DecidedJanuary 3, 1979

DocketNo. HH-212

StatusPublished

This text of 365 So. 2d 812 (Byrne v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Byrne v. State, 365 So. 2d 812, 1979 Fla. App. LEXIS 14071 (Fla. Ct. App. 1979).

Pincite

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

Raymond David Bryne appeals from a judgment and sentence for willfully withholding the means of support from minor children, pursuant to Section 856.04, Florida Statutes (1975). He contends that the evidence was insufficient to prove the essential elements of the offense. We agree and reverse.

For a conviction to be upheld under this statute, there must be a showing that the minor children were in need. Fekany v. State, 121 Fla. 51, 163 So. 221 (1935); Busch v. State, 97 Fla. 332, 120 So. 762 (1929); Griner v. State, 322 So.2d 647 (Fla. 1st DCA 1975). Here, there was a clear absence of evidence to establish need and thus the evidence is legally insufficient. The purpose of the criminal statute is to prevent the abandonment of children and to keep the children from being a charge on the public purse. Criminal prosecution should not be used where there is an adequate civil remedy to force a parent to support his children. Stedman v. State, 80 Fla. 547, 86 So. 428 (1920).

REVERSED.

ERVIN, Acting C. J., MELVIN, J. , and MASON, ERNEST E., Associate Judge, concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

Raymond David Bryne appeals from a judgment and sentence for willfully withholding the means of support from minor children, pursuant to Section 856.04, Florida Statutes (1975). He contends that the evidence was insufficient to prove the essential elements of the offense. We agree and reverse.

For a conviction to be upheld under this statute, there must be a showing that the minor children were in need. Fekany v. State, 121 Fla. 51, 163 So. 221 (1935); Busch v. State, 97 Fla. 332, 120 So. 762 (1929); Griner v. State, 322 So.2d 647 (Fla. 1st DCA 1975). Here, there was a clear absence of evidence to establish need and thus the evidence is legally insufficient. The purpose of the criminal statute is to prevent the abandonment of children and to keep the children from being a charge on the public purse. Criminal prosecution should not be used where there is an adequate civil remedy to force a parent to support his children. Stedman v. State, 80 Fla. 547, 86 So. 428 (1920).

REVERSED.

ERVIN, Acting C. J., MELVIN, J. , and MASON, ERNEST E., Associate Judge, concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

365 So. 2d 812, 1979 Fla. App. LEXIS 14071, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/byrne-v-state-fladistctapp-1979.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack