Byrne v. Ellis
This text of 1 Gunby 61 (Byrne v. Ellis) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Louisiana Court of Appeal primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Where defendant is sued by a clerk, who has been discharged without cause, for a balance due on his salary under a contract made by defendant and his former partner, who was a married woman, and it is shown that, before the discharge was [62]*62made, the partnership was dissolved and defendant had assumed all the liabilities thereof, held : The husband of the former partner is a competent witness to prove whether the contract of hire was by the month or by the year; his evidence is neither for nor against the interests of his wife. 2 An. 772; 5 An. 700.
At a subsequent trial of this case, Judge Clinton held : That defendant was bound for the entire salary, although it was shown that four months after discharge he was employed elsewhere at a larger salary.
Judge . Gunby held : That the suit is sounding in damages, and that plaintiff should not recover anything more than the amount of injury resulting from the discharge.
Both Judges held : That the value of defendant’s board, which was part of the consideration- to be given for his services, could not be recovered by him.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
1 Gunby 61, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/byrne-v-ellis-lactapp-1885.