Byrne v. City of New York

23 A.D.3d 422, 803 N.Y.S.2d 922

Opinion

In an action to recover damages for personal injuries, etc., the plaintiffs appeal from an order of the Supreme Court, Richmond County (Mega, J.), dated October 14, 2004, which denied their motion to compel the defendant New York City Transit Authority to produce an additional witness for deposition.

Ordered that the order is affirmed, with costs.

The Supreme Court properly denied the plaintiffs’ motion to compel the New York City Transit Authority to produce an additional witness for deposition since the plaintiffs failed to make a detailed showing of the necessity for taking further depositions (see Romero v Korn, 236 AD2d 598 [1997]; Defina v Brooklyn Union Gas Co., 217 AD2d 681, 682 [1995]; Colicchio v City of New York, 181 AD2d 528, 529 [1992]). Adams, J.P., Ritter, Goldstein, Skelos and Dillon, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Byrne v. City of New York, 23 A.D.3d 422, 803 N.Y.S.2d 922 (N.Y. Ct. App. 2005).

23 A.D.3d 422 (Byrne v. City of New York) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Colicchio v. City of New York
181 A.D.2d 528 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1992)
Defina v. Brooklyn Union Gas Co.
217 A.D.2d 681 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1995)
Romero v. Korn
236 A.D.2d 598 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1997)