Byrne v. Burke
966 A.2d 235, 290 Conn. 923
This text of 966 A.2d 235 (Byrne v. Burke) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Connecticut primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Bluebook
Byrne v. Burke, 966 A.2d 235, 290 Conn. 923 (Colo. 2009).
Opinion
Nicholas J. BYRNE, JR.
v.
Martin B. BURKE et al.
Supreme Court of Connecticut.
Nicholas J. Byrne, Jr., pro se, in support of the petition.
David P. Atkins, Marcy Tench Stovall, New Haven, Dawn E. Alderucci and David R. Makarewicz, Hartford, in opposition.
The plaintiffs petition for certification for appeal from the Appellate Court, 112 Conn.App. 262, 962 A.2d 825 (2009), is denied.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Byrne v. Burke
962 A.2d 825 (Connecticut Appellate Court, 2009)
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Bluebook (online)
966 A.2d 235, 290 Conn. 923, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/byrne-v-burke-conn-2009.