Byrd v. Stouffer

Opinion

UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 10-7451

DEWIGHT BYRD, a/k/a Charles W. Reed, III,

Plaintiff – Appellant,

v.

MICHAEL STOUFFER, Commissioner of Correction; GARY MAYNARD, Secretary of DPSCS; JOHN ROWLEY, Warden; D. NORTHCRAFT, Chief of Security; WERNER, Lieutenant, In their Individual and Official Capacity,

Defendants - Appellees.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Maryland, at Baltimore. Catherine C. Blake, District Judge. (1:08-cv-02368-CCB)

Submitted: April 12, 2011 Decided: April 29, 2011

Before SHEDD, DUNCAN, and KEENAN, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Dewight Byrd, Appellant Pro Se. Glenn William Bell, OFFICE OF THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF MARYLAND, Baltimore, Maryland, for Appellees.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. PER CURIAM:

Dewight Byrd appeals the district court’s order

granting summary judgment in favor of the Appellees on Byrd’s 42

U.S.C. § 1983 (2006) complaint. We have reviewed the record and

find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the

reasons stated by the district court. Byrd v. Stouffer, No.

1:08-cv-02368-CCB (D. Md. Sept. 30, 2010). We also deny Byrd’s

motion to appoint counsel. We dispense with oral argument

because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented

in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the

decisional process.

AFFIRMED