Byrd v. State

Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas

Byrd v. State

228 S.W.2d 858, 1950 Tex. Crim. App. LEXIS 2336

CourtCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas

DecidedApril 5, 1950

DocketNo. 24732

StatusPublished

Cited by2 cases

This text of 228 S.W.2d 858 (Byrd v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Byrd v. State, 228 S.W.2d 858, 1950 Tex. Crim. App. LEXIS 2336 (Tex. 1950).

Pincite

Opinion

BEAUCHAMP, Judge.

The appeal is from a conviction for assault to murder with malice, in which' the jury fixed a penalty of fifteen years in the penitentiary.

The record is before us without bills of ■exception and without statement of facts. No brief has begn filed- in behalf of appellant and we are not advised of any issue iupon which a reversal is sought.

The judgment in this case contains the jury’s verdict assessing the penalty at fifteen years. It then declares that •appellant shall be confined in the penitentiary “for a term of not less than 2 nor more than 15 years.” We have consistently held such judgments to-be void when assessed by the court upon a plea of guilty without a jury verdict fixing a definite penalty. However, when a case is appealed to this court, and the jury’s verdict gives us the basis for correcting the judgment, we have consistently done so. Accordingly, the judgment is reformed so as to read: It is therefore considered, ordered and adjudged by the Court that the Defendant, James Byrd, is guilty of the offense of Assault with intent to murder, as found by the jury, and that he be punished by confinement in the State Penitentiary for a term of fifteen years, and that the State of Texas do have and recover of the said Defendant James Byrd all costs in this prosecution expended, for which let execution issue.

The judgment must state a specific term of years. In this case the sentence correctly applies the indeterminate sentence law.

The judgment of the trial court as reformed is hereby affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

BEAUCHAMP, Judge.

The appeal is from a conviction for assault to murder with malice, in which' the jury fixed a penalty of fifteen years in the penitentiary.

The record is before us without bills of ■exception and without statement of facts. No brief has begn filed- in behalf of appellant and we are not advised of any issue iupon which a reversal is sought.

The judgment in this case contains the jury’s verdict assessing the penalty at fifteen years. It then declares that •appellant shall be confined in the penitentiary “for a term of not less than 2 nor more than 15 years.” We have consistently held such judgments to-be void when assessed by the court upon a plea of guilty without a jury verdict fixing a definite penalty. However, when a case is appealed to this court, and the jury’s verdict gives us the basis for correcting the judgment, we have consistently done so. Accordingly, the judgment is reformed so as to read: It is therefore considered, ordered and adjudged by the Court that the Defendant, James Byrd, is guilty of the offense of Assault with intent to murder, as found by the jury, and that he be punished by confinement in the State Penitentiary for a term of fifteen years, and that the State of Texas do have and recover of the said Defendant James Byrd all costs in this prosecution expended, for which let execution issue.

The judgment must state a specific term of years. In this case the sentence correctly applies the indeterminate sentence law.

The judgment of the trial court as reformed is hereby affirmed.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

228 S.W.2d 858, 1950 Tex. Crim. App. LEXIS 2336, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/byrd-v-state-texcrimapp-1950.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack