Byrd v. State

281 S.W. 1115, 104 Tex. Crim. 5, 1926 Tex. Crim. App. LEXIS 689

Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas·Decided April 7, 1926·No. No. 10076.·Published

Opinion

MORROW, Presiding Judge.

The offense is assault with intent to murder, punishment fixed at confinement in the penitentiary for a period of five years.

The record contains no statement of facts or complaint of the rulings of the trial court upon matters of procedure.

The indictment seems suificient to charge the offense. See Carr v. State, 41 Texas Crim. Rep. 547.

The judgment is affirmed.

Affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

MORROW, Presiding Judge.

The offense is assault with intent to murder, punishment fixed at confinement in the penitentiary for a period of five years.

The record contains no statement of facts or complaint of the rulings of the trial court upon matters of procedure.

The indictment seems suificient to charge the offense. See Carr v. State, 41 Texas Crim. Rep. 547.

The judgment is affirmed.

Affirmed.

Byrd v. State, 281 S.W. 1115, 104 Tex. Crim. 5, 1926 Tex. Crim. App. LEXIS 689 (Tex. 1926).

Pincite

281 S.W. 1115 (Byrd v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.