Byrd v. State

73 S.E. 34, 10 Ga. App. 214, 1911 Ga. App. LEXIS 722
CourtCourt of Appeals of Georgia
DecidedDecember 19, 1911
Docket3786
StatusPublished
Cited by1 cases

This text of 73 S.E. 34 (Byrd v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Georgia primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Byrd v. State, 73 S.E. 34, 10 Ga. App. 214, 1911 Ga. App. LEXIS 722 (Ga. Ct. App. 1911).

Opinion

Rowell, J.

1. Under all the circumstances, the court did not err in overruling the motion for a continuance.

2. Where the defendant, though under illegal arrest at the time, consents to be searched, and the search discloses that he has hidden upon his person stolen property, evidence of the discovery of the property in this manner is admissible against him in a prosecution for the larceny. Williams v. State, 100 Ga. 511 (28 S. E. 624, 39 L. R. A. 269).

3. Under the evidence, the court properly confined the issue to the count in the indictment which charged larceny from the house.

4. The evidence fully authorized the conviction; and no material error appears. Judgment affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Weatherington v. State
79 S.E. 240 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1913)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
73 S.E. 34, 10 Ga. App. 214, 1911 Ga. App. LEXIS 722, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/byrd-v-state-gactapp-1911.