Byrd v. State

167 So. 3d 480, 2015 Fla. App. LEXIS 8463, 2015 WL 3486609
District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided June 3, 2015·No. No. 3D15-803·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed. See Galindez v. State, 955 So.2d 517 (Fla.2007) (holding that a claimed violation of right to jury determination under Apprendi1 and Blakely2 is subject to a harmless error analysis); Rouse v. State, 965 So.2d 201 (Fla. 5th DCA 2007) (holding that, where jury found defendant guilty of second-degree murder, trial court’s inclusion of victim injury points on the sentencing guidelines score-sheet without a jury determination of that issue was harmless error because record demonstrated beyond a reasonable doubt that a rational jury would have found victim injury given its verdict finding defendant guilty of second-degree murder). See also Padilla v. State, 159 So.3d 1015 (Fla. 3d DCA 2015); Offord v. State, 970 So.2d 403 (Fla. 3d DCA 2007).

Footnotes

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Byrd v. State, 167 So. 3d 480, 2015 Fla. App. LEXIS 8463, 2015 WL 3486609 (Fla. Ct. App. 2015).

167 So. 3d 480 (Byrd v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Byrd v. State
District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2019