Byrd v. State

765 So. 2d 940, 2000 Fla. App. LEXIS 11032, 2000 WL 1225859
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Byrd v. State. Read the opinion of the Court — 794 So. 2d 671
District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided August 30, 2000·No. No. 4D00-2187·Published

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

We review the order of the trial court summarily denying Bruce L. Byrd’s motion filed pursuant to Florida Rule of Criminal Procedure 3.800, alleging his right to be resentenced under the 1994 sentencing guidelines.

The Supreme Court of Florida has recently held that the operative window period in which to challenge the sentencing guideline provisions amended by Chapter 95-184, Laws of Florida, commenced- on October 1, 1995, and ended on May 24, 1997. See Trapp v. State, 760 So.2d 924 (Fla.2000). As we did in Speed v. State, 764 So.2d 873 (Fla. 4th DCA 2000), we agree with Judge Altenbernd’s analysis in Smith v. State, 761 So.2d 419 (Fla. 2d DCA 2000), on the need to remand such cases for a recalculation of the defendant’s sentences under the 1994 guidelines score-sheet.

[941]*941Accordingly, we reverse the order denying 3.800 relief and remand for consideration of whether resentencing is required pursuant to Heggs v. State, 759 So.2d 620 (Fla.2000)(revised opinion).

WARNER, C.J., STEVENSON and SHAHOOD, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Byrd v. State, 765 So. 2d 940, 2000 Fla. App. LEXIS 11032, 2000 WL 1225859 (Fla. Ct. App. 2000).

765 So. 2d 940 (Byrd v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Speed v. State
764 So. 2d 873 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2000)
Trapp v. State
760 So. 2d 924 (Supreme Court of Florida, 2000)
Smith v. State
761 So. 2d 419 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2000)
Heggs v. State
759 So. 2d 620 (Supreme Court of Florida, 2000)